Re: John Titor - ein Warner, den man ernst nehmen sollte

Geschrieben von Apollo am 21. September 2003 18:10:09:

Als Antwort auf: Re: John Titor - ein Warner, den man ernst nehmen sollte geschrieben von IT Oma am 21. September 2003 09:01:53:

>warum "grrrr"? Ich denke, da versucht jemand, vor einer Entwicklung zu warnen

hallo Oma

habe mal ein paar interessante passagen rauskopiert :

>>(16) There is a civil war in the United States that starts in 2005. That conflict flares up and down for 10 years. In 2015, Russia launches a nuclear strike against the major cities in the United States (which is the "other side" of the civil war from my perspective), China and Europe. The United States counter attacks. The US cities are destroyed along with the AFE (American Federal Empire)...thus we (in the country) won. The European Union and China were also destroyed. Russia is now our largest trading partner and the Capitol of the US was moved to Omaha Nebraska.

(34) I know exactly where I was and every detail of the exact moment the first nuclear warheads began falling on Jacksonville.

What event started the war? Can it be stopped?

(41) The war is a result of faulty politics and desperation from Western leadership during the US civil war. Yes, I suppose you could stop it.

(62) Russia's enemy in the United States is not you, the average person. Russia's enemy is the United States government.

Does the current relationship between Arabs and Jews have anything to do with the coming war?

(63) Real disruptions in world events begin with the destabilization of the West as a result of degrading US foreign policy and consistency.

(64) This becomes apparent around 2004 as civil unrest develops near the next presidential election.

(65) The Jewish population in Israel is not prepared for a true offensive war. They are prepared for the ultimate defense.

(66) Wavering western support for Israel is what gives Israel's neighbors the confidence to attack.

(67) The last resort for a defensive Israel and its offensive Arab neighbors is to use weapons of mass destruction.

How and why do the Arabs Jews become entangled in the civil war of the U.S.A?

(69) They are not directly involved but political situations are dependant on Western stability, which collapses in 2005.

The Arab countries appear to have weapons of mass destruction. Do they use them against America?

(70) Not against America but they are used against each other.

59. After the war, the United States had split into five separate regions based on the various factors and military objectives they each had.
Are the Olympics still being played in the future?

60. As a result of the many conflicts, no, there were no official Olympics after 2004. However, it appears they may be revived in 2040.

64. The year 2008 was a general date by which time everyone will realize the world they thought they were living in was over.


65. The civil war in the United States will start in 2004. I would describe it as having a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse. The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012 and end in 2015 with a very short WWIII. <<

------------------------------------------------------------------------


====> vergleiche mal den Kriegsbeginn in den USA : zuoberst - bei der Schau in 2000 ist es 2005...und bei der Schau in 2001 ist es 2004.Scheint da die allgemeine bedrohungslage in der " Zeitqualität " akkuter zu werden ?

Interessant auch die Olympischen Spiel von 2004 die für lange zeit die letzten sein werden. ( ich erinnere mich dunkel an eine Prophz. nach der der grosse Konflikt NACH den grossen Spielen losgehen soll.. )


Von oben etwas zum aktuellem Nahen Osten :

>Does the current relationship between Arabs and Jews have anything to do with the coming war?

(63) Real disruptions in world events begin with the destabilization of the West as a result of degrading US foreign policy and consistency.

Frage :Haben die laufenden Beziehungen zwischen Arabern und Juden etwas zu tun mit dem kommenden Krieg ?

Antwort : Echte Störungen/ Unterbrüche ( Terroranschläge ?) bei Weltveranstaltungen, beginnend ( einhergehend ?)mit der Destabilisierung des Westens...als Resultat erniedrigender US - Aussenpolitik und ( deren ) Konsequenz.

ahnen wir es nicht schon lange...?

apollo




Antworten: