Fußnoten von Teil 1
Geschrieben von MP42 am 23. Oktober 2003 15:59:50:
Als Antwort auf: Wer war Izetbegovic? und warum Preisen ihn die USA UND der Iran? geschrieben von MP42 am 23. Oktober 2003 15:58:53:
========================================================
* Footnotes and Further Reading *
========================================================
[1]IRNA news agency, Tehran, in English 1129 gmt 20 Oct 03
[2] M2 Presswire; October 21, 2003; Headline: US Dept Of State - Death of former President Alija Izetbegovic - Press Statement - Adam Ereli
[3] The quote is from an article in the London Telegraph. For a longer quote, see "U.S. & Iran: Enemies in Public, but Secret Allies in Terror," at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/deja.htm#telegraph
This article discusses Pentagon/Saudi/Iranian cooperation in Bosnia.[4] Alija Izetbegovic, Islamska Deklaracija (BOSNA, Sarajevo, 1990) p. 3
Note that the Islamic Declaration was reissued by Izetbegovic during the important 1990 elections; thus to make perfectly clear where he stood. (This text was translated by Petar Makara.)[5] Newsweek, December 18, 1995, United States Edition, National Affairs; Pg. 32, 1240 Words, Sarajevo On The Spot, By Russell Watson And Rod Nordland
[6] Bosnia suffers genocide as the world - and America - remains silent. (Originated from Knight-Ridder/Tribune News Service) Jennifer Scarlott; Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service Dec 21, 1993 p1221K5689 (696 words)
[7] ‘The last ambassador: a memoir of the collapse of Yugoslavia.’ By Warren Zimmerman; Foreign Affairs March-April 1995 v74 n2 p2(19) (8919 words)
[8] See, 'Pro-Yugoslav Muslim Leader Put on Trial,' at http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/abdic.htm
[9] Galbraith's congressional testimony included the following statement:
"Two years ago the Bosnian government asked the Croatian government to permit the transit through Croatia of weapons for its beleaguered army. A principal supplier of these arms would be Iran. The Croatian government asked for our reaction, the administration decided we would not answer, and I told the Croatians I had no instructions. The Croatians understood this response and a subsequent colloquy described to you by Ambassador Redman to mean that we would not object to their role in helping the Bosnians. I believed then, and even more strongly now, that the administration made the right decision."
Peter Galbraith, U.S. Ambassador to Croatia; Iran/Bosnia Arms; House International Relations Committee; 30 May 1996[10] "U.S. & Iran: Enemies in Public, but Secret Allies in Terror: The US and Iran have long cooperated to sponsor Islamist terror"
by Jared Israel, Francisco Gil-White,
Petar Makara, and Nico Varkevisser
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/deja.htm[11] To get some idea of the enormity of the U.S./NATO war against Bosnian Serb *civilians* read Tika Jankovic's 1997 report on his investigative trip to the Bosnian Serb Republic, posted at http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/tika/hell.htm#3
[12] Islamic religious rules cover areas that are left to personal discretion in most societies. Consider, for example, these elaborate requirements for intimate personal hygiene. [Scroll down to the subhead, 'Rules of Toilet']
http://islam-pure.de/imam/fatwas/practical02.htm#Rules%20of%20Toilet%20[TakhalliWhile Shari'a may not currently be enforced with the ferocity of the Taliban or of Saudi Arabia in all Islamist states, keep in mind two things.
A) Wherever it is enforced, it may subject *all* citizens to the rule of men whose authority derives from Islam and who are trained in its ancient teachings. This leads to very sharp conflict, for example in places like Nigeria. To understand what motivates the non-Muslims who are resisting Shari'a in Nigeria, consider the case of Adama Yunusa. This 19- year-old had sued her fiancé, Isa Katagum, for impregnating her and refusing to marry her. So: we have Ms. Yanusa, 19 years old, that is, little more than a child, and Mr. Katagum, perhaps not much older. And we have a personal tragedy, small, but very real for these young people. What do they need? They need some intelligent help from their elders, so they can resolve the mess they have gotten themselves in. How did the Shari'a court deal with this little tragedy?
First, Ms. Yanusa could not, of course, meet the Shari'a requirement to produce four male witnesses who could confirm that she had had sex with Isa Katagum. So the Shari'a court threw out her charges. Second, since she was pregnant, and it was therefore apparent that she'd had sex with *someone,* the judges, in their exercise of 1300-year-old wisdom, found her guilty of the crime of fornication. She was sentenced to 100 strokes of the cane, to be administered publicly, after the baby was born. [Scroll down to, 'Sharia: Woman Gets 100 Strokes Over Pregnancy']
http://members.internettrash.com/rolfbmiller/engl-akt2.htmlB) Once Shari'a is in force, its severity can increase according to the rulings of religious authorities and/or the mood of the Islamic population. And in States governed by Shari'a, the *only* views that count are those of Muslim men.
[13] For a glimpse into the world of the Saudi "Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice," see
"Saudi police 'stopped' fire rescue," BBC, Friday, 15 March, 2002, 12:19 GMT at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1874471.stmwww.tenc.net
Emperor's Clothes