Re:off topic Der prophezeite russische "Wunderpanzer"
Geschrieben von Brunnenbauer am 03. April 2003 07:21:28:
Als Antwort auf: Re:off topic Der prophezeite russische "Wunderpanzer" geschrieben von Scorp am 02. April 2003 00:56:50:
Ein aehnlicher Artikel stand vor ca. 6 Wochen in der russischen Wochenzeitung "argumenty i fakti". Hier wird ein aufgeruesteter T90 Panzer praesentiert, der ueber eine kombiniertes Abwehrsystem aus Radar- u. Infrarot verfuegt und mittels einer dadurch gesteuerten Aktivpanzerung bis zu 10 anfliegende Objekte gleichzeitig abwehren kann. Natuerlich ist in den russischen Streitkraeften kein Geld vorhanden, die notwendigen 3 Mio. US-$ fuer die Umruestung pro Stueck zu bezahlen....
Der "Prototyp" befindet sich nun ebenfalls seit 4 Jahren in der "Testphase".
>Er heißt T-95
>Nizhny Tagil New Main Battle Tank
>Is this what it looks like?
>A new MBT was developed by V. Potkin's design team in Nizhny Tagil, at the Uralvagonzavod Plant where all the latest Russian tanks except the T-80 were manufactured.
>This vehicle is intended to become the new Russian MBT and was planned to enter service in 1994, but due to lack of financing it is still on the testing grounds (according to some reports it has cleared the testing phase around March 1999). As a result, the Russian Army is stuck with the obsolete designs of T-64/T-72/T-80/T-90 line for much longer than it wishes.
>The MBT doesn't yet have any lofty name and hides behind some obscure "ob'ekt" designation. In March 2000 the Defense Minister Igor Sergeev, while visiting Nizhny Tagil, said that Russia now "has a new T-95 tank" referring to the MBT being discussed here. It is unclear if this means that the vehicle is finally fielded (as only a fielded vehicle may get T-95 designation), or he just used the term that is sufficiently known in the West to avoid getting into details.
>I could find very little about this vehicle, because it is all classified data. Here is the precious little I could gather, thanks mostly to Col. Viktor Mourakhovsky.
>Crew protection on the tank will be emphasized to a far greater degree than ever before in Russian tank designs. The level of crew protection should ensure its survival when the tank is hit by any anti-tank munitions from any aspect or angle, thanks to the crew placement in a unitary armored pod inside the hull.
>A unique drivetrain suspension system is being tested on this tank that to a certain extent extinguishes the hull vibrations and stabilizes its position.
>The tank still remains in Class 50 (i.e. it weighs 50 tons) and it shall have an even smaller silhouette than the modern Russian MBTs.
>The gun will be a 152mm smoothbore tank gun/ATGM launcher. The development of this system started as far back as end of the fifties for the heavy tanks (originally a rifled gun, probably M-69). The project was revived in the eighties and the gun was significantly redesigned. Even with ordinary powders a very high initial velocity of an APFSDS projectile is achieved. I could not, unfortunately, learn how the caliber increase is going to influence ammunition allowance and rate of fire.
>This gun shall be located in an unmanned gun pod on top of the hull with no crew access to it. This is likely to increase survivability and lower the silhouette even further.
>The fire control system will be multi-channel (optical + thermal + IR + laser + radar).
>The carousel autoloader goes away.
>According to plans the crew will consist of a 3 man combat structure and one mechanic (not unlike the air force crew structure), who will be responsible for vehicle maintenance and will reside in a battalion service and repair company.
>I hope that the veil of secrecy will lift a bit and I will learn more details about this MBT.
>Until that time, here is an older page on which I was collecting various tidbits of information about this tank in 1998. Since some newspapers were already quick to use the information on that page as a description of T-95, I would like to specifically stress that the information there is obsolete.
>http://armor.kiev.ua/fofanov/Tanks/
>das würde heissen das das ding seit min. 4 jahren produziert wird, finanziert durch rüstungsexporte älterer waffen.
>soviel zum "mythos" der so geschwächten, veralterten vor sich hin rostenden russischen armee. es passt immer besser zusammen, moderne waffen, ein "truppenübungsplatz" in tschetschenien und jetzt noch als bonus eine livevorführung amerikanischer waffentechnik und kampftaktik praktisch vor der haustür.
>grüsse scorp
>
>grüsse scorp