Re: Fragen an basecampUSA

Geschrieben von basecampUSA am 10. September 2005 03:19:51:

Als Antwort auf: Re: Fragen an basecampUSA geschrieben von DaveRave am 09. September 2005 12:44:39:

>Hallo Johannes,
>vergiss mal Deine (irrige) Auffassung, ich würde alles von vornherein bezweifeln und in den Dreck ziehen. ;)
>Dass derartige Lager existieren, muss doch gar nicht durch Wandersburschen nachgeprüft werden, das wird ja auch von offizieller Seite in den USA gar nicht bestritten. Schau Dir mal nachfolgendes PDF der US Army an, besonders Chapter 3 ist interessant.
>Die Frage ist doch vielmehr, wann, wie, ob und unter welchen Umständen solche Lager "befüllt" werden und das wird Dir kein Laie letztendlich beantworten können.
>Viele Grüße!
>DR

Ganz klar bezieht es sich auf zivil gefangenen die fuer's militaer kostenlos arbeiten, und da voruebergehend auch gehalten werden... hat nichts mit KZ-aehnliche verhaeltnisse zu tun...

Civilian inmate labor programs
a. Civilian inmate labor programs benefit both the Army and corrections systems by—
(1) Providing a source of labor at no direct labor cost to Army installations to accomplish tasks that would not be
possible otherwise due to the manning and funding constraints under which the Army operates.
(2) Providing meaningful work for inmates and, in some cases, additional space to alleviate overcrowding in nearby
corrections facilities.
(3) Making cost–effective use of buildings and land not otherwise being used.
b. Except for the 3 exceptions listed in paragraph 2–1d below, installation civilian inmate labor programs may use
civilian inmate labor only from Federal corrections facilities located either off or on the installation.
c. Keys to operating an effective civilian inmate labor program on Army installations include—
(1) Establishing a comprehensive lease agreement, interservice, interagency, and/or interdepartmental support agreement
(ISA), and/or memoranda of agreement with the corrections facility.
(2) Developing a cooperative working relationship between installation personnel and corrections facility personnel.
(3) Working closely with installation government employee labor unions to ensure union leaders understand the
program and have current information on program status.
(4) Training all installation personnel involved in the operation or administration of the program frequently.
(5) Developing a public affairs plan informing the installation and the surrounding local community of the program
and work projects assigned to civilian inmate labor.

2–1. Policy statement
a. With a few exceptions, the Army’s Civilian Inmate Labor Program is currently limited to using inmates from
facilities under the control of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP). Section 4125(a), Title 18, United States Code
allows the Attorney General to make available to other Federal agencies the services of Federal inmates and defines the
types of services inmates can perform. The FBOP provides civilian inmate labor free of charge to the Army.
b. The Army is not interested in, nor can afford, any relationship with a corrections facility if that relationship
stipulates payment for civilian inmate labor. Installation civilian inmate labor program operating costs must not exceed
the cost avoidance generated from using inmate labor (see para 4–3 for a discussion of cost avoidance).
c. Guidelines in this regulation for establishing installation civilian inmate labor programs pertain to negotiating with
Federal corrections facilities only. Currently, there is no overarching law that addresses establishing State and/or local
civilian inmate labor programs on Department of Defense (DOD) military facilities when these programs use inmates
from off–post corrections facilities.
d. However, there are 3 exceptions to using State or local civilian inmate labor from off–post corrections facilities—
(1) Section 1065, PL 103–337, allows the Army to conduct a demonstration project. This demonstration project tests
the feasibility of providing prerelease employment training to nonviolent offenders in a State corrections facility. The
demonstration project is limited to 3 Army installations. The 3 Army installations participating in the demonstration
project may use inmates from an off–post State corrections facility.
(2) Army National Guard units leasing facilities from the Army or occupying State–owned land or facilities may use
inmates from an off–post State and/or local corrections facility.
(3) The prohibition against use of State and/or local civilian inmate labor from off–post corrections facilities does
not apply to Civil Works projects where the Army has statutory authority to accept voluntary contributions in the form
of services from State or local governments. If contributed, inmate services are combined with materials or services
paid for with Federally appropriated funds; the use of civilian inmate labor must also comply with the provisions of EO
11755. The use of civilian inmate labor under these exceptions must still comply with the requirements of this
regulation.
e. Installation commanders must address, in memoranda of agreement with the corrections facilities, all items in the
governing provisions (para 2–3 below).
f. Section 4125(a), Title 18, United States Code and EO 11755 are incorporated into this regulation at appendix E.

gruss, basecamp


Antworten: