Re: Wußten wir das nicht alle??
Geschrieben von katzenhai2 am 16. Dezember 2001 05:38:43:
Als Antwort auf: Re: Wußten wir das nicht alle?? geschrieben von Freddie am 14. Dezember 2001 12:24:53:
Ich weiß nicht, woran die sich hochgeilen.
Selbst wenn er von "Sie haben berechnet" sprach und nicht "Wir haben berechnet", ist das dasselbe, soll heißen, er war informiert und hat mitgemacht.Und er HAT mitgemacht. Die Organisation mag ein anderer gemacht haben, aber er hat die Männer zur Verfügung gestellt, die er ausgebildet hat.
Er ist der religiöse Führer.
Ich weiß wirklich nicht, was die ganzen "Arabischen" Professoren eigentlich wollen?!?!?
Bin Laden spricht menschenverachtend über andere Menschen. Trotzdem tun sie alle so, als wenn es eher ihr religiöser Führer wäre!!Ich weiß wirklich nicht, wieso ausgerechnet Araber mehr zu Bin Laden halten sollten, wenn sie wirklich Vorirteilsfrei sind.
---------
>Hallo Uwe,
>also als ich das gestern in den Nachrichten sah war mein erster Gedanke:
>"Ich bin mal gespannt wie lange es dauert bis jetzt Verschwörungsgerüchte
>auftauchen" :-)
>Den Medien kann man nichts mehr glauben und die INet-Gerüchteküchen verbreiten
>auch oft nur Unsinn (nicht immer).
>Ich persönlich glaube schon das islamistische Kreise hinter den Anschlägen
>stecken, hätte jetzt aber viel eher auf Saudi-Arabien getippt. Aber egal
>wer es auch war, es ist unmöglich das der CIA nichts davon gewusst hat. Das
>lasse ich mir von niemanden weiss machen.
>Hier mal ein anderer Auszug von Whatreallyhappend:
>
>ANOTHER FRAUDULENT TRANSLATION.
>NEW! Latest breaking...
>
>Guys, we are Arabic translators and the words of OBL in the US Gov tape and
>what is being written are not accurate. The use of "We asked" "We expected"
>and "We calculated" are in fact not the words used as he actually says "They
>asked" "They said" "They calculated".....these are the words of a spectator not
>a MASTERMIND!!
>and...
>The Bin Ladin video tape finally released by the Pentagon turned out to only
>prove four things:
>1-That the audio quality of Bin Ladins voice was the worst of those talking on
>the video (?)
>2-The sound was so bad that the Arabic grammer could be heard either way i.e.
>we did, we said, could also be heard as they did, they said etc. Which mean the
>difference between a person being a spectator or a mastermind.
>3-Bin Ladin must be exceedingly stupid to admit in an open dinner party (this
>while the US air force and special forces are carpet bombing the entire
>country) and with kids and guests all over the place that he planned and
>carried out the WTC attacks while previousely declaring to the World he had
>nothing to do with it.
>
>4-If he is that stupid then there is no way a person of that level of
>intelligence could have pulled of the sophisticated operation Washington claims
>he did from the caves of Afghanistan!
>
>and...
>
>1. Bin Laden mumbles. His voice is barely audible.
>
>2. His alleged comments are taken out of context. Notice how lenghty
>conversations are reduced to just a few sentences of translated script.
>3. The translators were hired by the US government.
>4. Even if the translations are generally accurate, Bin Laden's comments can
>just as easily apply to someone who had no knowledge of the attacks as they
>could to someone who plannned them.
>
>5. Bin Laden is alleged to have said he learned that the attacks were going to
>happen on the previous Thursday. How can someone who "masterminded" 9-11 only
>have learned about them 5 days in advance?
>6. Bin Laden is alleged to have talked about expecting the iron-ore to melt.
>He must be quite a psychic because the actual designers of the WTC didnt even
>expect a collapse to happen. When Bin Laden speaks about what he "calculated"
>would happen, it could easily mean what he expected to happen after hearing of
>the first strike.
>7. CNN was interviewing an Arab professor shortly after it showed the tape. The
>professor said that Bin Laden's voice was so inaudible that the tape is not
>conclusive. CNN then stopped speaking to him and he was cut off!